Over 50% of game developers now think generative AI is bad for the industry, a dramatic increase from just 2 years ago: ‘I’d rather quit the industry than use generative AI’

AI in Gaming: A Double-Edged Sword as Developers Split on Its Impact

The gaming industry is at a crossroads as generative AI continues to make waves, but not everyone is on board. According to a recent survey by the Game Developers Conference (GDC), 33% of game developers now use generative AI in their work—a figure that has remained relatively stable since 2021. However, the sentiment surrounding its use has shifted dramatically, with more developers expressing concerns about its impact on the industry.

The survey, which polled over 2,300 game developers, reveals a growing divide. A staggering 52% of respondents believe generative AI is having a negative impact on the gaming industry, up from just 18% two years ago and 30% last year. In stark contrast, only 7% view AI as a positive force, down from 13% in the previous year. The skepticism is particularly pronounced among artists, designers, writers, and programmers—those whose creative and technical skills are most directly affected by AI’s rise.

Interestingly, the survey also highlights a generational and hierarchical divide in AI adoption. Business professionals and upper management are the most frequent users of generative AI, with 58% and 47% respectively incorporating it into their workflows. In contrast, lower-level employees and those in creative roles are far less likely to embrace the technology. This trend aligns with long-standing suspicions that executives are more inclined to adopt AI as a productivity tool, while those on the creative front lines remain wary.

But what exactly are developers using generative AI for? Contrary to fears of AI replacing human creativity, the survey shows that most developers are using it for practical, behind-the-scenes tasks. Research and brainstorming top the list at 81%, followed by office work like email responses (47%), coding assistance (47%), and prototyping (35%). This suggests that, for now, AI is more of a supportive tool than a creative powerhouse.

However, the debate over AI’s role in gaming is far from settled. Some developers are vocal in their opposition, describing generative AI as “built on theft and plagiarism” and a “regurgitated amalgamation of everything that’s come before.” One UK-based game design supervisor even declared, “I’d rather quit the industry than use generative AI.” Another US-based consultant joked, “Our standing rule is: If one of us brings up using GenAI in any of our work, then it’s safe to assume we’ve been assimilated by The Thing and should be burned alive by Kurt Russell.”

On the other hand, proponents of AI argue that it’s a valuable tool for productivity and accessibility. One developer noted, “I use [AI] to help me project manage. As a neurodivergent person, I struggle with segmenting big picture ideas into manageable small tasks. AI is great for those kinds of help.” Another went so far as to claim they are “intentionally working on a platform that will put all game devs out of work and allow kids to prompt and direct their own content.”

The debate over generative AI in gaming is a microcosm of the broader conversation about technology’s role in creative industries. While some see it as a revolutionary tool, others fear it could erode the very essence of human creativity. As the gaming industry continues to evolve, one thing is clear: the conversation around AI is far from over.

Tags: #AIinGaming #GenerativeAI #GameDevelopment #TechTrends #GamingIndustry #CreativeTech #FutureOfGaming #AIControversy #GameDevSurvey #TechInnovation

Viral Sentences:

• “I’d rather quit the industry than use generative AI.”
• “Our standing rule is: If one of us brings up using GenAI, we’ve been assimilated by The Thing.”
• “AI is built on theft and plagiarism.”
• “I’m intentionally working on a platform to put all game devs out of work.”
• “As a neurodivergent person, AI helps me manage big picture ideas.”

,