Clawdbot, Moltbot, OpenClaw? The Wild Ride of This Viral AI Agent
Here’s a detailed, tech-focused rewrite of the news story with a viral tone, reaching at least 1200 words, followed by a list of viral tags and phrases:
OpenClaw: The AI Assistant That Molted Through Chaos to Become a Tech Sensation
In the breakneck world of AI innovation, few stories have been as chaotic, captivating, and downright bizarre as the rise of OpenClaw. What began as Clawdbot—an open-source AI assistant promising to actually do things on your computer, not just chat—exploded into viral fame, only to nearly implode under the weight of its own success. Trademark disputes, crypto scammers, and a lobster mascot that briefly sprouted a disturbingly handsome human face: this is the tale of how OpenClaw emerged from the digital maelstrom, bruised but beloved, as the AI assistant everyone’s talking about.
The Meteoric Rise: Five Days That Changed Everything
Five days. That’s all it took for Clawdbot to rocket from a promising open-source project to a viral sensation, amassing over 60,000 GitHub stars and capturing the imagination of the tech world. Created by Peter Steinberger, an Austrian developer who sold his company PSPDFKit for around $119 million, Clawdbot promised something revolutionary: an AI assistant that lives where you actually communicate—WhatsApp, Telegram, iMessage, Slack, Discord, Signal—and doesn’t just chat, but does stuff. Real stuff. On your computer. Through the apps you use.
Imagine texting your AI assistant like you’d text a friend, and it remembers your conversations from weeks ago, sends you proactive reminders, and—if you give it permission—automates tasks, runs commands, and acts like a digital personal assistant that never sleeps. Unlike its founder, who admits he got bored after selling his company and decided to build this instead.
The project launched about three weeks ago and hit 9,000 GitHub stars in 24 hours. By the time the dust settled late last week, it had rocketed past 60,000 stars, with everyone from AI researcher Andrej Karpathy to investor (and White House AI and crypto czar) David Sacks singing its praises. MacStories called it “the future of personal AI assistants.”
The Chaos: A Viral Meltdown
Then things got weird.
Ostensibly, last weekend, Anthropic slid into Steinberger’s inbox to point out that “Clawd” (the assistant’s name) and “Clawdbot” (the project name) were maybe just a little too similar to its own AI, Claude. “As a trademark owner, we have an obligation to protect our marks—so we reached out directly to the creator of Clawdbot about this,” a representative from Anthropic said in an email statement.
By 3:38 a.m. US Eastern Time on Tuesday, Jan. 27, Steinberger made his call: “@Moltbot it is.”
What happened next was like a digital heist movie, except everyone was a bot and the getaway cars were social media handles.
Within seconds—literally, seconds—automated bots sniped the @clawdbot handle. The squatter immediately posted a crypto wallet address. Meanwhile, in a sleep-deprived panic, Steinberger accidentally renamed his personal GitHub account instead of the organization’s account. Bots grabbed “steipete” before he could blink. He said both crises required him to call in contacts at X and GitHub to make fixes.
Then there was what the creators dubbed “the Handsome Molty incident.” Steinberger instructed Molty (the AI) to redesign its own icon. In one memorable attempt to make the mascot look “5 years older,” the AI generated a human man’s face grafted onto a lobster body. The internet turned it into a meme (a la Handsome Squidward) within minutes.
Fake profiles claiming to be “Head of Engineering at Clawdbot” shilled crypto schemes. A fake $CLAWD cryptocurrency briefly hit a $16 million market cap before crashing over 90%. “Any project that lists me as coin owner is a SCAM,” Steinberger posted on X, exasperated, to thousands of increasingly confused followers.
To continue the chaotic saga that has unfolded over the past week, as of Jan. 30, the project has settled on renaming Moltbot to OpenClaw, bringing in “Open” for open source and “Claw” for its lobster heritage. The name change makes sense due to those considerations. However, the reasoning is actually much simpler: Steinberger just didn’t like the name.
The Innovation: Why OpenClaw Matters
Strip away the chaos, and OpenClaw is genuinely impressive.
Most AI tools are basically the same. You open a website, type a question or query, wait for it to generate, copy the answer, paste it somewhere else, etc., etc. OpenClaw wants to flip that script by having the assistant inside your existing conversations. You’re already in WhatsApp or iMessage, so why not just text it like you’d text a coworker?
The killer features? Well, there are three main things.
For one, persistent memory. OpenClaw doesn’t forget everything when you close the app. It learns your preferences, tracks ongoing projects, and actually remembers that conversation you had last Tuesday.
There are also proactive notifications. It can message you first when something matters, such as daily briefings, deadline reminders, and email triage summaries. You can wake up to a text saying, “Here are your three priorities today,” without having to ask the AI first.
Finally, there’s real automation. Depending on your setup, it can schedule tasks, fill forms, organize files, search your email, generate reports, and control smart home devices. People reported using it for everything from inbox cleanup to research threads that span days, and from habit tracking to automated weekly recaps of what they shipped. The use cases seem to keep multiplying because once it’s wired into your actual tools (calendar, notes, email), it stops feeling like software and is just part of your routine.
The Risks: Security Concerns in the Age of Autonomous AI
Time for real talk. OpenClaw is not a polished, enterprise-ready product with vendor support and compliance paperwork—which is something Steinberger admits. It’s a fast-moving, open-source project that just survived a near-death experience involving trademark lawyers, crypto scammers, and catastrophically exposed databases.
So, you might be wondering, through all this hoopla, whether OpenClaw is even something you should actually try. Sure, this tool remembers information across weeks, works between apps and systems, and provides proactive notifications. But it’s got rough edges. This isn’t a tool for you if you need something that “just works” and doesn’t have complicated installation steps.
And you probably don’t want to take this on if you don’t want to think about—and don’t deeply understand—cybersecurity.
Security experts have raised red flags about OpenClaw’s safety as it grows in popularity. Because the agent is designed to run locally and interact with emails, files, and credentials, even small setup mistakes can have big consequences.
In recent days, researchers spotted numerous publicly accessible OpenClaw deployments with little or no authentication, exposing API keys, chat logs, and system access to anyone who stumbled across them.
Some of the most visible security concerns have been social rather than technical, including fake Clawdbot/Moltbot/OpenClaw downloads and hijacked accounts used to spread malware or scams. While developers have moved quickly to patch specific flaws, security analysts say OpenClaw’s turbulent debut highlights a larger issue facing AI agents: As they become more autonomous and more powerful, the security risks also scale just as fast.
Roy Akerman, head of cloud and identity security at Silverfort, an identity security platform, said in an email to CNET that the risk of a tool like OpenClaw isn’t that it’s overtly malicious. What’s risky is that it continues to act under a legitimate human identity, which can blur the lines between a user and the machine acting on their behalf.
“When an AI agent continues to operate using a human’s credentials, after the human has logged off, it becomes a hybrid identity that most security controls aren’t designed to recognize or govern,” Akerman said. “Organizations shouldn’t try to block these tools outright, but they do need to change their posture, treat autonomous agents as identities, limit their privileges, and monitor behavior continuously, not just logins.”
The Legacy: The Little Lobster That Molted (and Kept Going)
According to Steinberger, “Molting is what lobsters do to grow.” They shed their old shell and emerge bigger: from Clawdbot to Moltbot to OpenClaw.
OpenClaw is the same software as Clawdbot, offering the same impressive engineering and vision of what personal AI assistants could be. But the past almost-120 hours forced it to grow up fast, dealing with security vulnerabilities, battening down authentication, and learning that viral success attracts not just users but scammers, squatters, and, yes, intellectual property lawyers.
Through all of this, OpenClaw is still standing. Discord is still buzzing. GitHub stars keep climbing. And somewhere in Vienna (or maybe London), Peter Steinberger is probably still fending off DMs from people asking if he’s launching a crypto token. (He’s not. Please stop asking.)
Want to try OpenClaw yourself? Head to openclaw.ai for documentation, installation guides, and, most importantly, a security checklist.
Just maybe use a spare laptop. And definitely don’t name your project after anyone’s trademarked AI model. Turns out that matters.
Viral Tags and Phrases:
- AI assistant that actually does stuff
- Molted through chaos
- Crypto scammers and trademark disputes
- Handsome Molty meme
- OpenClaw: the little lobster that could
- Persistent memory across weeks
- Proactive notifications that message you first
- Real automation: schedule tasks, fill forms, organize files
- Security risks: exposed databases, fake downloads
- Hybrid identity: AI acting under human credentials
- Viral fame in five days
- 60,000+ GitHub stars and climbing
- The future of personal AI assistants
- Don’t name your project after Claude
- Use a spare laptop (security first!)
- Discord buzzing, GitHub stars climbing
- Peter Steinberger: the bored billionaire developer
- Hands-on AI: inside your existing conversations
- The chaos that made OpenClaw stronger
,




Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!