The Death of Social Networks: How Platforms Became Attention Factories—and the One That Still Feels Human

By Susam Pal on January 20, 2026

Remember when social media actually felt social? When you’d log in, scroll through updates from people you genuinely cared about, and feel connected rather than manipulated? Those early days of Web 2.0 represented something revolutionary—a genuine democratization of online communication where users weren’t just consumers but creators, participants, and community builders.

The optimism was palpable. We were witnessing the information superhighway finally delivering on its promise. Platforms like Twitter (back when it was still lowercase), Facebook in its college-only days, and early Instagram felt like digital town squares where real human connections flourished. You followed friends, family, and interesting people. When someone posted, their followers actually saw it. Notifications meant something—a friend had messaged you, someone had commented on your photo, a real human interaction had occurred.

Then, sometime between 2012 and 2016, everything changed. And not for the better.

The first sign of trouble was the infinite scroll. I still remember the cognitive dissonance I felt the first time I realized there was no bottom to a page. Logically, I understood that web pages were virtual constructs—just pixels arranged to create the illusion of a document. But my brain had learned to treat them as physical objects with clear boundaries. The sudden disappearance of that endpoint disturbed something fundamental about how I processed digital information.

It wasn’t just a design choice; it was a psychological manipulation. By removing the natural stopping point, platforms could keep users engaged indefinitely. The scroll became a slot machine lever, each pull delivering unpredictable rewards in the form of new content. This wasn’t about serving users anymore—it was about maximizing engagement metrics.

Then came the notification apocalypse. What had once been genuine signals of human interaction transformed into arbitrary prompts designed to drag you back into the app. Someone you followed posted something? Notification. Someone you don’t know liked something someone you follow posted? Notification. The algorithm decided this random piece of content might interest you? Notification.

The notification system stopped serving users and started serving itself. It felt like a violation of an unspoken social contract between platforms and their communities. Despite this degradation, these services retained some diluted social functionality. The notifications were manipulative, yes, but they were still nominally about people you had chosen to follow or interact with. That, too, would soon disappear.

Over time, the timeline became increasingly polluted with content from random strangers. My feed transformed from a curated stream of updates from people I cared about into a chaotic firehose of algorithmic content designed to maximize engagement at all costs. Using these platforms began to feel like standing in front of a blaring loudspeaker, broadcasting fragments of conversations from all over the world directly into my face.

That’s when I checked out. There was nothing social about these services anymore. They had become what I call attention media—platforms designed not to connect people but to harvest human attention and sell it to the highest bidder. My attention is precious to me. I cannot spend it mindlessly scrolling through videos that have neither relevance nor substance to my life.

But where one avenue disappeared, another emerged. A few years ago, I stumbled upon Mastodon, and it felt like stepping into a time machine that transported me back to the early days of Twitter. Back in 2006, I followed a small number of fascinating people on Twitter and received genuinely interesting updates from them. The platform felt like a conversation among friends and colleagues, not a battleground for attention.

Now, when I log into the ruins of those older platforms, all I see are random videos presented to me for reasons I cannot infer and do not care about. Mastodon, by contrast, still feels like social networking in the original sense. I follow a small number of people I genuinely find interesting, and I receive their updates and only their updates. What I see is the result of my own choices rather than a system trying to optimize my behavior.

There are no bogus notifications. The timeline feels calm and predictable. If there are no new updates from people I follow, there is nothing to see. It feels closer to how social networks used to work originally—platforms designed to serve users rather than harvest their attention.

The difference is philosophical as much as technical. Traditional social networks operate on an extractive model: extract user data, extract attention, extract engagement, and convert it all into advertising revenue. Mastodon and similar federated platforms operate on a different principle—one where the platform serves the community rather than the other way around.

I hope Mastodon stays that way. In a digital landscape increasingly dominated by attention-harvesting algorithms and engagement-maximizing design patterns, it represents a rare oasis of genuine social connection. It’s proof that we don’t have to accept the degradation of our online social spaces as inevitable.

The death of social networks wasn’t inevitable—it was a choice. A choice made by companies prioritizing quarterly earnings over user wellbeing, engagement metrics over meaningful connections, and advertising revenue over authentic community. But the choice to build something different is always available to us.

Perhaps the future of social networking isn’t about building bigger platforms with more sophisticated algorithms, but about returning to smaller, more human-scale communities where people connect meaningfully rather than merely consume content. In that sense, the future might look a lot like the past—before social networks became attention media.

Tags: #SocialMedia #AttentionEconomy #Mastodon #Web2.0 #InfiniteScroll #DigitalWellbeing #FederatedSocialMedia #AttentionHarvesting #SocialNetworking #TechHistory #PlatformDecay #HumanScaleTech

Viral Sentences: The death of social media was a choice, not an inevitability. Infinite scroll broke our brains. Notifications became weapons of mass distraction. Your attention is the product. The timeline that serves you, not the algorithm. Social media stopped being social. Attention media replaced social networks. The platform that remembers it’s supposed to serve people. Digital town squares turned into attention factories. The quiet revolution of federated social media. When engagement metrics replaced human connection. The algorithm optimized for your time, not your wellbeing. Social networking’s original promise still lives in the fediverse. The platform that doesn’t want to own your attention.

,