Colorado is working on a bill that would make it illegal to 3D print firearms and gun parts

In a bold move that could reshape the landscape of firearm regulation in the United States, a coalition of Colorado lawmakers has taken a decisive step toward curbing the proliferation of so-called “ghost guns.” These untraceable, do-it-yourself firearms have become an increasingly pressing concern for law enforcement agencies nationwide, as they often evade traditional tracking methods and regulatory oversight. The state’s House Judiciary Committee has now voted 7-4 in favor of advancing HB26-1144, a groundbreaking bill that seeks to prohibit the use of 3D printers and similar technologies to manufacture firearms or their components.

Ghost guns, as they are colloquially known, are typically assembled from kits or produced using 3D printing technology, allowing individuals to bypass federal background checks and serial number requirements. This lack of traceability has made them a favored tool among criminals and those seeking to evade gun laws. The proposed legislation, HB26-1144, goes beyond simply banning the act of 3D printing firearms; it also criminalizes the possession and distribution of instructions for manufacturing such weapons. However, the bill includes an exemption for federally licensed firearm manufacturers, ensuring that legitimate businesses can continue their operations without disruption.

The bill’s sponsor, Lindsay Gilchrist, emphasized the growing threat posed by ghost guns, stating, “These ghost guns are increasingly found at crime scenes, making it harder for law enforcement to track down a suspect because the gun isn’t traceable.” This sentiment underscores the urgency of the issue, as law enforcement agencies across the country grapple with the challenges posed by these untraceable weapons.

Colorado has been at the forefront of efforts to regulate ghost guns, having already passed SB23-279 in 2023, which banned the possession and creation of such firearms. However, HB26-1144 represents a significant escalation in the state’s approach, targeting the problem at its source by preventing the manufacture of ghost guns before they even exist. Under the proposed law, first-time offenders would face misdemeanor charges, while repeat violations would be upgraded to felony offenses, reflecting the seriousness with which the state views this issue.

The bill’s passage through the House Judiciary Committee marks a critical milestone, but the journey is far from over. HB26-1144 must still secure approval from both the Colorado Senate and House of Representatives before it can be sent to the governor for signature into law. If successful, Colorado would join a growing number of states taking proactive measures to address the ghost gun phenomenon, setting a precedent that could influence national policy.

The rise of ghost guns has been fueled by advancements in 3D printing technology, which have made it easier than ever for individuals to manufacture firearms in the privacy of their own homes. This technological democratization of gun production has outpaced existing regulatory frameworks, creating a loophole that lawmakers are now scrambling to close. The proposed legislation in Colorado is a direct response to this challenge, aiming to bring the production of firearms in line with traditional manufacturing and sales processes.

Critics of the bill argue that it infringes on Second Amendment rights and stifles innovation in the 3D printing industry. However, proponents contend that the measure is a necessary step to ensure public safety and enhance the ability of law enforcement to combat gun-related crimes. The debate over ghost guns is emblematic of the broader national conversation about gun control, balancing individual freedoms with collective security.

As the bill moves through the legislative process, it is likely to face intense scrutiny and debate. The outcome could have far-reaching implications, not only for Colorado but for the entire country. If successful, HB26-1144 could serve as a model for other states grappling with the same issue, potentially leading to a patchwork of regulations that address the unique challenges posed by ghost guns.

In the meantime, the bill’s advancement represents a significant victory for those advocating for stricter gun control measures. It sends a clear message that lawmakers are willing to take bold action to address emerging threats, even in the face of technological advancements that complicate traditional regulatory approaches. As the debate continues, all eyes will be on Colorado to see whether this pioneering legislation can pave the way for a safer, more secure future.

Tags: Ghost guns, 3D printed firearms, Colorado legislation, HB26-1144, gun control, untraceable weapons, Lindsay Gilchrist, firearm regulation, Second Amendment, public safety, law enforcement, technological innovation, legislative process, misdemeanor, felony, serial numbers, background checks, firearm components, manufacturing, distribution, instructions, crime scenes, traceability, federal requirements, licensed manufacturers, SB23-279, House Judiciary Committee, Senate, House of Representatives, governor, national policy, gun-related crimes, individual freedoms, collective security, regulatory frameworks, technological democratization, privacy, public debate, scrutiny, model legislation, patchwork regulations, emerging threats, pioneering legislation, safer future.,